Board Thread:Wiki Business/@comment-2152025-20160304010518/@comment-31117173-20171110102138

Regarding Category:Members involved in Scandals

When is something considered a "scandal" and when not?

I just wondered about this, because we aren't adding Renako nor Taguchi to the list, because they didn't talk about it, right? But, sometimes things are so obvious and widespread, does it really need Up-Fronts seal of approval? Is it because we need a source of some kind? Why would Taguchis'  case not be considered a scandal when in the Japanese social media people are freaking out about it and there is even a kiss picture (new 3rd pic) isn't this some kind of source? Why is Reina in this category? I just know of a blog post of Reina and Sayu (and Eri I think?) in which they were bashing Koreans and made fun of their eyes and later apologized in another post - would something like that count with a valid source? How about newspaper articles?

I think there should be clearer rules regarding this category, so that everybody knows when it's ok to add something and when it is not. I really think not everybody here can tell what is counted as a scandal here and what not, so the admins should maybe sum it up for everybody or decide by themselves when somebody found a new potential source? It's totally unclear.