Talk:Morning Musume/@comment-26181155-20150628011133/@comment-131168-20150630163258

There was probably discussion about it, but it looks like all the comments on this article from before March 2014 are gone, and the big split was January 2014. But in short I think it was just that having a page with just a link for the history section seemed too little. And it is a lot shorter here (about 1/3 the size of the full history page), but it's still really long. Maybe the joined years would make more sense if it was even shorter and split into chunks like through 2000, through 2005, through 2010? Probably does make sense to let the most recent history (a couple years?) be bigger, though.