User blog comment:Maopyon/Citing Websites/@comment-4074115-20140825165007/@comment-2152025-20140825171510

I will take note on that consideration. ( ´ ▽ ` )ﾉ

Technically, it's not really about accuracy. Lol. I just felt like there is a grey line between official sites (which is mainly in Japanese) and English websites made my fans (unofficial websites). Items from Type C are always accepted as a substitute for Type A as long as the translator gets credited. There have been cases when the translators or fans of a website argue about lack of crediting to the writer/translator.

Type D, which are fan-made news sites with sources, are also accepted as a substitute over Type B. Mainly, the reason is below it's because the lack of news credentials. They are still accepted as a reliable source.

I feel like pushing Type E and Type F one rank down to add Wiki-related content as Type E. Since we do have content that originally came from Wikipedia. :<

Only (the new) Type F and Type G will be the ones that are pretty much discouraged. c: